Category : Parlay betting
Category : Parlay betting
The Speaker should be held in contempt, fined, and removed from office for the flagrant waste of public tax payers’ money.
In the aforementioned Representative’s case, he blatantly wasted American tax dollars, for which he should be removed from office. Others felt that this particular act of perjury, while illegal, did not reach that level because his lie was specifically in regard to a matter of personal infidelity and that the questioning that led to it was allegedly politically-motivated.
Article Directory: http://www.articledashboard.com
. Such is not the case. But expulsion won’t happen. The Representative in this case wasted tax dollars because of his stupidity, taking time away from real business, educated investigation, examination, and analysis.
It’s time to close the door on wasting tax payer dollars on like inquiries, investigations, and summaries.
Members of Congress waste millions, if not billions, of tax dollars every fiscal year. The offended audience made it glaringly clear, nearly without controversy, and stressed the need to enforce significant actions to remove him and other similar offenders from office.
At a time when America is floundering in a financial quagmire, one brought on by intellectual cheaters of the fiscal markets, we should rely on leaders to stand tall, ask intelligent questions, and not waste our tax dollars.
By: The Anxiolytic
The House also recently entered into an agreement with a comedian to the tune of $120,000, so he could perform his routine for them. The political leadership of our nation should take note of the collective consternation of the American public, as the displeasure with American politics is clear, as evident with the accompanying video from one southern Congressman.
This professional politician, an obviously inaniloquent, uneducated idiot, one placed into office by maladroit American voters, is but one prime example of the money wasted by an office meant to serve the American people.
We, the American public, however, won’t ever see such a process enacted. He is guarded by the plaintive howls of his peers, whose votes a while back gave them, as members of either the House or Senate, raises of $4,700 and $5,300, while voting against Social Security cost of living raise in both 2010 and 2012. The subject debated as to what exactly entailed levels of high crimes and misdemeanors. The exact meaning of the term misdemeanors became the subject of debate while President Clinton held office. Wasting tax payers’ money should be considered a misdemeanor.
Inept members of Congress are leaving an appalling blemish upon America. While the House may have roared with laughter, the view from the street is quite different. It wasn’t until the public outcry against the raises was heard loud and clear did they pass legislation to halt the increases.
How to Get the Work at Home Work Done
Copyright 2010 Richard Albright LLC
Impeachment proceedings may be commenced by a member of the House of Representatives on their own initiative, but you can bet members of the House would never elect to take action or remove a member of their own house from office. Congressional inquiries are meant to gather facts and data for legislation. It’s time for Congress to parlay this process into one of introspection. This Representative should be charged with negligence and abuse of power while in office and removed. The rules guarding Senators and Representatives alike should be changed. Congressional inquiries or spending activities that irreverently waste tax payer dollars should be career-enders for those who partake is such activity. It’s time to put a halt to unwarranted waste of our tax dollars by making it a punishable offense.
To some, the questioning process of this Representative is funny. Some felt that the act of perjury, a federal crime, was an impeachable act Go Here
Polia also was required to pick the over or under on that game. “So I thought it was strange when I looked at it [Tuesday] morning and saw that I won.”
Polia then called up William Hill and the person on the other line informed her that she was picking against the spread. Her card had the Cardinals and Bengals as four-point favorites, and they won by 23 and 10, respectively.
The Chargers, as a two-point favorite, beat the Dolphins by 16. She bet that both teams would score more than 45 points. Even though she was getting higher odds for picking against the spread, she said she spent time just picking who she thought was going to win the game instead.
For William Hill sports book director Nick Bogdanovich, this weekend wasn’t a good one, to say the least. “He was frustrated since I wasn’t getting it right away.”
The final game of the parlay was on Monday night, where she had the Lions as a three-point underdog. They scored 61.
“I remembered that I picked the Giants and they lost,” Polia said. She cashed in by being on the right side of the point spread in 14 games and correctly picking the over in the Steelers/ Broncos game.
Polia said she has loved sports her entire life — a Celtics logo tattoo on her hip is a testament to her love of Boston, which she left because she got sick of the winters.
Aside from the Giants as five-point underdogs, Polia’s card had the Vikings as a five-point favorite, and they won by 21. The Panthers beat the Giants by three. She had the Falcons as a three-point underdog, and the Texans and Redskins as one-point underdogs; they won and covered. “Of course, he didn’t believe me.”
Polia said, upon hearing the news, she fell to the floor of the law firm where she works in disbelief and, minutes later, said she was going out to lunch.
One of the biggest long shots in betting history will be cashed on Wednesday afternoon when Tayla Polia gets paid $100,005 for her $5, 15-leg NFL parlay that came through this week.
The against-all-odds story gets better: Polia said this is only the second bet she has placed in her life.
An hour later, Polia, with $20 in her account, risked $5 on the parlay. The Patriots and Seahawks were 14-point favorites and they both won by 17. The Chiefs, as an eight-point favorite, crushed the Ravens by 20.
“I somehow drove back home to tell my boyfriend in person,” Polia said. Polia had the Giants as a five-point underdog.
Bogdanovich said the $5 15-team parlay card for $100,000 has hit before. A progressive pot of $170,782 was split by 17 people.
Her dream, she says, is to make Vegas a pit stop on the way to owning a beach house in California.
Thanks to one of the most improbable betting stories, that might happen sooner rather than later.
“On Sunday morning, my boyfriend and I were sitting on the couch talking about how spreads worked,” Polia said.
The 26-year-old Polia, who had just moved to Las Vegas two months ago, got 20,000-to-1 odds on the parlay card on betting firm William Hill’s mobile site. The Packers won by 10 as a three-point favorite. William Hill paid out a couple times in Delaware, where betting on the cards is permitted.. Not only did Polia’s payout come through, but a 15-game parlay where bettors just have to pick the winners also hit. They beat the Saints, 35-27.
The closest game she had was the Steelers, who were six-point favorites on the card, beating the Broncos by a touchdown after spotting Denver a 17-point lead Go Here
Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, No. Jack Markell’s legal counsel,
said in a statement. “The sports lottery has
already — in three weeks — had more wagered than the entire
1976 Delaware sports lottery season.”
The state can offer parlay bets — which depend on the
outcome of several matches — on National Football League
The NCAA, or National Collegiate Athletic Association, also
joined the complaint by the leagues.
Delaware offered parlay bets on NFL games for a few months
in 1976. Jack Markell, et al, U.S. “We realize that it is rare that the Third
Circuit will hear cases with all 12 active judges, but this was
an important issue for the state of Delaware and we thought the
state should have a chance to make its case at trial.”
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in court
documents signed by Judge Thomas Hardiman, denied the request
for a rehearing before the larger court.
Hardiman was one of the three judges who ruled unanimously
in August that Delaware’s plan violated federal law.
Delaware could ask the U.S. The court opinion agreed with the leagues that
Delaware was generally limited to what it offered in 1976, when
it allowed gamblers to bet on winners of several NFL games.
CHICAGO, Sept 29 Delaware’s appeal of a ruling
that its plan to allow betting on professional sports violates
a federal ban will not be heard, a federal court ruled on
Delaware had planned to allow point-spread bets on
individual games in all major sports from three racetrack
A 1992 federal law known as PASPA prohibits betting on
sports, although that law was grandfathered in Delaware,
Oregon, Montana and Nevada, and allowed them to offer such
wagering if it was limited to plans the states had operated
between 1976 and 1990.. Supreme Court to take the case,
but Markell spokesman Joe Ragolsky said that was unlikely.
“It is important to remember that the NFL tried to shut
down Delaware’s sports lottery entirely, but today Delaware has
the only legal sports wagering east of the Rocky Mountains,”
Barlow said of the parlay betting. 09-3297.
(Reporting by Ben Klayman, editing by Maureen Bavdek)
“Obviously, we are disappointed with today’s ruling,
Michael Barlow, Delaware Gov.
The North American professional leagues for baseball,
basketball, football and hockey filed suit to block the state’s
plan, arguing it violated federal law and that it might taint
their sports with accusations of cheating.
Markell signed the betting law in May, saying at the time
it would bring in $50 million and help close the state’s budget
shortfall, which for fiscal 2010 has been estimated at $800
The case is In re Office of the Commissioner of Baseball,
et al v Go Here