programs for securing, reducing and eliminating weapons usable nuclear materials are a critical part of our strategy for combating nuclear terrorism and preventing the proliferation of these deadly dangerous materials…A decision to significantly cut these programs, including our near-term ability to dispose of excess plutonium, would be a setback to our ability to reach critical security goals.”
Asked for comment, NNSA spokesman Robert Middaugh said he could not respond until the budget has been formally released. Its construction would be greatly slowed, while the Defense Department and the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration study alternative ways to safeguard tons of the excess plutonium.
Under the 2014 proposal, the Energy Department’s nuclear weapons activities funding — which includes modernization efforts for bomber-based and missile-based warheads — would be increased roughly 7 percent, or around $500 million, above the current level of $7.227 billion for these activities.
The new weapons-related spending would expand efforts to upgrade the W76, W88, W78, and B-61 warheads, and help fund construction of a new facility in Tennessee for processing uranium, a nuclear explosive used in these and other warheads. “These cuts are going to be huge,” and will be particularly problematic amid budget boosts for weapons programs that many lawmakers believe “have been mismanaged for the last five to six years.”
To cover the $10 billion total cost overrun, the Energy Department and its National Nuclear Security Administration agreed to transfer roughly $3 billion into weapons work from management accounts and other internal savings. A Pentagon spokeswoman, Jennifer D. (Work on the facility and its equipment was well along when DOE abruptly realized it would not be large enough to accommodate needed machinery, forcing a costly redesign and lengthy delays.)
The Center for Public Integrity has previously reported administration officials had agreed that the number of nuclear warheads the U.S. Elzea, declined to address the issue in detail but confirmed that “over the past year DOD and DOE carried out a joint study regarding DOD’s nuclear weapons requirements and funding options for those requirements. But he said officials may have calculated that they cannot win congressional support for further cuts in nuclear arsenals with Russia without spending billions more to refurbish America’s remaining stockpile of nuclear weapons, under a bargain Obama struck during his first term.
One, who asked not to be named, said the DOE shortfall had set off “months of wrangling” about the issue, not only within the department but at the highest levels of the administration. These programs have experienced billions of dollars in cost overruns in recent years, forcing the administration to look elsewhere in the DOE budget to find the money it needs to keep them alive.
Only one category of Energy Department nonproliferation work would be increased — research and development, mostly to finance work on a new nuclear detonation sensor to be placed about Air Force satellites.. “If confirmed, I intend to make sure that [DOE laboratories and intelligence experts] … continue to sustain the nation’s nuclear security,” he said, without delving into budgetary issues or specific programs.
The priority shift “is going to be a disaster,” said a Democratic congressional aide, who asked not to be identified because he was not authorized to speak on the budget before its official release. because our national security depends on it.”
Specifically, officials said, the Energy Department determined in consultation with the Pentagon that it would likely need $10 billion in new funds to fulfill all of its promises to the military for the production of modernized warheads, over the next decade alone.
Tom Collina, research director for the Arms Control Association, a Washington-based nonprofit group, said “in a way,” it seems inconsistent for the administration to promote arms control while cutting the DOE’s nonproliferation budget. The study determined that the modernization program was underfunded, and steps have been taken to ensure adequate funding for essential modernization needs moving forward.”
The plant is about 60 percent completed, but one senior administration official called it “managerially and programmatically, a nightmare,” with continuously rising costs.
In the end, the Pentagon was cajoled into contributing $3 billion more. As recently as December 3, President Obama described the government’s nuclear nonproliferation efforts — including some directed by the Defense Department — as “one of our most important national security programs.” Speaking at the National Defense University, Obama said the effort was “nowhere near done. But that still left a $4 billion gap between DOE’s nuclear weapons-related promises to the military and its ability to complete that work, forcing a scramble during the department’s budget deliberations to cut from other programs, officials said.
Secretary of Energy nominee Ernest Moniz, speaking at a Senate confirmation hearing Tuesday, ducked multiple questions from Sen. “I will certainly look into this with high priority” if confirmed, he told Scott.
The department also needs more funds than anticipated for improvements to the W76 warhead, which is carried by Trident submarine-based missiles.
But several officials and other sources familiar with the administration’s budget deliberations this year said the DOE nuclear weapons-related cost overruns and the new austerity climate gripping Washington – including the demand under so-called “sequestration” legislation for $54 billion in national security spending cuts each year until 2021 -had upended the administration’s plans to spend more on nonproliferation.
The Energy Department needs at least $3 billion to $5 billion more to upgrade the B61 nuclear bomb — meant for deployment aboard strategic and tactical aircraft — than it initially expected, and several billions of dollars more to cover cost overruns in construction of the uranium processing facility. Tim Scott (R.-S.C.) about whether he supports completing the MOX plant. Sam Nunn, said “the U.S. But Democrats on Capitol Hill and independent arms control groups predicted the decision will provoke controversy and a substantial budget fight this year.
The department’s nonproliferation programs, aimed at diminishing the security threat posed by fissile materials in other countries that can be used for nuclear weapons, would be cut by roughly 20 percent, or Go Here
The bottom line _ the pits produced meet all functional quality requirements for use and are fully accepted by NNSA.”
On the Net:
FOXNews.com – Quality of Nuclear Devices Questioned – Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum
By H. Project on Government Oversight: http://www.pogo.org
Los Alamos National Laboratory: http://www.lanl.gov/
A single trigger made at Rocky Flats cost less than $4 million. That required extensive computer modeling and testing to assure precise shape, size and weight and that the triggers meet performance requirements.
Precise manufacture of the trigger is essential.
Sunday, January 20, 2008
“The manufacturing process for the W88 has been incredibly, thoroughly vetted,” said Jeanloz. So far, nine have earned the “diamond stamp” from the National Nuclear Security Administration, which oversees the lab’s programs. The original triggers were made with the benefit of underground nuclear testing, which the U.S. The result is a a massive hydrogen blast.
But Los Alamos and agency officials bristle at suggestions that the new triggers might be less reliable or have flaws that could affect their performance.
The agency acknowledged there were “more than 70 engineering authorizations” _ as it characterizes the waivers _ approved in the new W88 pit certification and that this was a “relative high number.”
A watchdog group now is raising questions about whether the replacement triggers, also known as pits, can be guaranteed to be as reliable as those already in some 400 W88 warheads. no longer conducts underground nuclear tests, the Los Alamos scientists had to rely on other sources to replicate the original triggers and guarantee that the replacements would be as reliable as the old. The scientist spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the issue.
Raymond Jeanloz of the University of California at Berkeley, a longtime adviser to the government on nuclear weapons issues, said in an interview he is not surprised there have been some modification in the W88 warhead, but that does not mean it is less reliable.
The government acknowledges differences between the old triggers and their replacements.
The new ones were made by using a mold to cast the grapefruit-size plutonium sphere. halted in 1992, and through a different process than the replacements. All rights reserved. The number has been estimated at about 400, in addition to an estimated 3,200 W76 warheads that also are designed for the submarine-based Trident II missile.
Since last summer’s announcement, the Los Alamos lab has made 10 additional W88 triggers. This process is viewed by metallurgists as producing a stronger product.
Because the U.S. The last of the original triggers were manufactured in the late 1980s.
The Project on Government Oversight says it was told by some Los Alamos scientists that the trigger certified last July and known as the W88 pit needed 72 waivers from the specifications used for the original triggers, including 53 engineering-related changes.
In an e-mail response to the watchdog group’s claims, Bernard Pleau, a spokesman for the agency’s office at Los Alamos, said the changes do not “compromise the integrity of the parts. That difference in cost was noted by Brian in the letter to the energy secretary.
The government will not say how many W88 warheads it has. These means included small-scale plutonium tests, technical data from past underground tests, and computer codes and models.
Officials say the cost figures reflect the fact that new facilities and a new process for making the replacement triggers had to be developed. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
. JOSEF HEBERT, Associated Press Writer
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. For years, however, testing the warhead’s components to ensure the weapon produces the intended blast instead of a fizzle has been complicated by a lack of replacement plutonium triggers.
Last summer, the first replacement plutonium trigger in 18 years received “diamond stamp” approval signaling it was ready for use in a warhead. Such approval means they are ready to use.
The change in manufacturing process, from wrought to cast, has been a subject of debate and extensive analysis among those involved in nuclear weapons. It meant the warheads, after testing that makes the original trigger unsuitable for reuse, could be reassembled with a new trigger and put back into service.
Kevin Roark, a spokesman for the Los Alamos weapons program said the changes in specifications “have been fully explored, fully vetted and fully accepted by NNSA and engineering analysis (conducted) by us.”
Any variation or flaw in the pit could cause a warhead not to detonate properly or to detonate with less explosive power than expected.
At least one other replacement pit required 71 specification waivers, a Los Alamos scientist indirectly involved in the production process told The Associated Press. That, in turn, creates the high temperatures and pressure to ignite a “secondary” nuclear component. The original triggers, all made at the now-closed Rocky Flats facility in Colorado, were hammered into precise form. She posed that question in a letter last Friday to Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman.
Resting atop the Trident II missile, the W88 warhead is among the mainstays of the country’s submarine-based nuclear arsenal. Scientists at Los Alamos and at the government’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California concluded the change did not degrade the reliability of the triggers, according to NNSA.
“With this large number of waivers, how is it possible to objectively tell whether the pit will even work?” said Danielle Brian, executive director of the group that monitors nuclear weapons-related activities. To scientists at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, that was a milestone to celebrate. At Los Alamos, it has cost an estimated $430 million over 10 years to certify the first trigger. He was on a panel that last year concluded the plutonium in warhead triggers is much sturdier than previously thought, with a life span of as much 100 years.
National Nuclear Security Administration: http://www.nnsa.doe.gov/
In a warhead’s detonation, a conventional explosive packaged around the pit compresses the plutonium Go Here
Afterward she would just go sit in the car. Not repentant enough, or something like that.
I wasn’t DF’d because I was never baptized, I was “disassociated,” which is like Disfellowshipping Lite, because I asked to be removed from the congregation. I remember her coming to meetings and just sitting. After about six months of this she wrote a letter to the society asking to be reinstated; she was turned down.
. She ended up leaving “The Truth” completely, and almost 20 years later, doesn’t look back at all. However, my sister was DF’d Go Here
According to the Los Alamos National Laboratory, the move “restores the nation’s ability to make nuclear weapons,” and was needed so the Energy Department could replace pits found unsafe or destroyed through regular check-ups.
But some members of Congress believe conventional weapons could do the same job, and worry that mini-nukes would blur the line between conventional and nuclear weapons. Edward Kennedy, the administration has budgeted $700 million for studying how testing might resume. According to Sen. “Unless we do a lot more research and development and we find some quantum breakthrough in conventional systems, to go deep is going to require a nuclear capability.”
The Little Boy bomb dropped on Hiroshima delivered around 15 kilotons. Two had been recovered and three were still missing as of 5 p.m. D. Five people watching the surf from Hurricane Bill were swept out to sea at Acadia National Park in Maine. Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat, asked recently.
A memo obtained by a British newspaper indicates that at a conference this summer, Defense and Energy department officials will consider questions like: “What is the uncertainty in confidence and potential risk threshold for a test recommendation–what would demand a test?”
The Foster Panel, which studied the testing issue last year, recommended improvements that would allow a test within three months to a year of deciding to do so. spent more in real terms on atomic defense activities than since 1962.
Strategy — In its Nuclear Posture Review last year, the administration identified Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, North Korea as countries where “contingencies” could arise that U.S. “One way you ensure that there are no safe havens is to be able to go deep,” said Armed Services Committee chairman Rep. — did not prohibit designing a testing device with a yield below five kilotons, modifying an existing weapon for safety reasons or conducting research and development necessary “to address proliferation concerns.”
Copyright 2003 CBS. Crouch, the assistant secretary of Defense for International Security Policy, said in a briefing last year.
“How can we effectively seek to dissuade others from developing nuclear weapons while we are going forward with the development of new nuclear weapons ourselves?” Sen. arsenal. “If you were to have a problem with a weapon system that you needed to rectify using a test, you would want to be able to do that faster,” J. wants to stop proliferation.
“Nuclear weapons have a unique ability to destroy both agent containers and (Chemical and Biological Weapons),” reads a 2001 Pentagon study.
Last year, the U.S. All rights reserved.
Announcing its approval of the bill Friday, the Senate Armed Services committee stressed that nothing in the repeal means it has authorized “the testing, acquisition, or deployment of a low-yield nuclear weapon.”
The move to clear the legal hurdles on manufacturing mini-nukes is part of a broad review of U.S.
By Jarrett Murphy
CBSNews.com’s Jarrett Murphy takes a look at the prospects for the U.S. arsenal, the submarine-launched Mk-5 holds eight W88 warheads of 475 kilotons each.
Defense officials said in 2002 that at present, the U.S could go from the decision to test to a trial run in two to three years. Duncan Hunter, R.-Calif., last May. Nelson.. has signed but not ratified — the administration says it has no plans to conduct a test. “nuclear strike capabilities” must be geared towards, according to a leaked copy of the report.
The 1993 low-yield ban that the current defense bill would delete stated that “it shall be the policy of the United States not to conduct research and development which could lead to the production by the United States of a new low-yield nuclear weapon, including a precision low-yield warhead.”
The ban — named after sponsors Elizabeth Furse, D-Ore., retired, and John Spratt, D-S.C. Others contend that making more bombs is a bad idea if the U.S.
At the same time, however, last month the United States produced a plutonium pit — the core of a fission bomb — for the first time in 14 years. development of low-yield nuclear weapons.
The Bush administration may get permission to create kinder, gentler or at least smaller nuclear weapons if Congress overturns a ban on doing so.
The defense appropriations bill now winding its way through the Hill contains a clause revoking the 1993 Spratt-Furse amendment, which prohibits the development of so-called “low-yield” nuclear weapons – bombs that pack a punch of less than five kilotons.
But the administration says smaller nuclear arms may eventually be needed to deal with the emerging threat of rogue states hoarding weapons of mass destruction.
A kiloton is equal to the explosive force of one thousand tons of TNT. conducted its last nuclear test in 1992, and while the White House opposes the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty — which the U.S.
However, the administration is paying increasing attention to the possibility that it might at some point have to resume testing if there were a question about the reliability of the nation’s stockpile. In the modern U.S. A bomb of just one kiloton, detonated 30 meters below the earth, can open a crater wider than a football field, according to Princeton physicist Robert W. ET Sunday.
AP Photo/Canadian Press/Tim Krochak
But some experts contend that no bomb of any size could go very deep, because the heavier the bomb, the harder the impact — and the harder the impact, the more likely the bomb would explode before it reached sufficient depth.
Testing — The U.S. policy on nuclear weapons, which has included:
Bunker busters — For the second year in a row, the Energy Department is requesting $15 million to study the need for a Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP).
Supporters say these weapons might be necessary to deal with so-called “hard and deeply buried targets” in rogue states and terrorist camps, of which there might be 10,000 in the world.
CAROUSEL – People watch as water breaches a rock wall at Lawrencetown, Nova Scotia, Canada, Sunday, August 23, 2009. Last Go Here
- – – -
Gerard Pique (Spain) 11/1 34/4 38/6 Man Utd
Dani Alves (Brazil) 11/2 32/2 40/5 Sevilla
Carles Puyol (Spain) 7/0 99/2 99/2
Eric Abidal (France) 7/0 28/0 49/0 Monaco/Lyon
Maxwell (Brazil) 7/0 14/0 50/0 Ajax/Inter
Adriano (Brazil) 6/0 6/0 16/1 Sevilla
Gabi Milito (Argentina) 2/0 16/0 16/0
Marc Bartra (Spain) 1/0 1/0 1/0
Andreu Fontas (Spain) 1/1 1/1 1/1
Sergi Gomez (Spain) 0/0 0/0 0/0
Marc Muniesa (Spain) 0/0 0/0 0/0
Martin Montoya (Spain) 0/0 0/0 0/0
Overall match record: P453 W250 D105 L98 F889 A462
Goalkeepers A/G1 A/G2 A/G3 Other clubs
Victor Valdes (Spain) 10/0 77/0 77/0
Jose Manuel Pinto (Spain) 2/0 2/0 7/0 Celta Vigo
Ruben Mino (Spain) 0/0 0/0 0/0
Oier Olazabal (Spain) 0/0 0/0 0/0
CL match record: P158 W88 D42 L28 F303 A158
(Compiled by Paul Radford, Editing by Toby Davis; To query
or comment on this story email
29.09.10 GP A v Rubin Kazan 1-1 Villa pen
May 25 Barcelona players’ individual factfiles
ahead of Saturday’s Champions League final:
Champions League appearances: 15
Lionel Messi (Argentina) 12/11 56/36 56/36
Pedro Rodriguez (Spain) 11/4 24/8 24/8
David Villa (Spain) 11/3 11/3 25/9 Valencia
Bojan Krkic (Spain) 3/0 26/5 26/5
Nolito (Spain) 0/0 0/0 0/0
8.03.11 KO H v Arsenal 3-1 Messi 2 Xavi
24.11.10 GP A v Panathinaikos 3-0 Pedro 2, Messi
6.04.11 QF H v Shakhtar Donetsk 5-1 Iniesta, Dani Alves,
Pique, Keita, Xavi
12.04.11 QF A v Shakhtar Donetsk 1-0 Messi
CL matches this season: P12 W8 D3 L1 F27 A8
Scorers: Messi 11, Pedro 4, Villa 3, Dani Alves 2, Xavi 2,
Fontas, 1, Iniesta 1, Keita 1, Pique 1, Vazquez 1
2.11.10 GP A v FC Copenhagen 1-1 Messi
14.09.10 GP H v Panathinaikos 5-1 Messi 2, Villa,
Pedro, Dani Alves
Xavi Hernandez (Spain) 11/2 110/8 110/8
Sergio Busquets (Spain) 11/0 29/2 29/2
Javier Mascherano (Argentina) 10/0 10/0 38/0 Liverpool
Andres Iniesta (Spain) 9/1 68/6 68/6
Seydou Keita (Mali) 9/1 29/3 44/5 OM/Lens/
Coach: Pep Guardiola (Spain) CL Record: P37 W21 D12 L4
(A/G=CL Appearances/goals, 1=current season, 2=with current
club, 3=total career)
3.05.11 SF H v Real Madrid 1-1 Pedro
27.04.11 SF A v Real Madrid 2-0 Messi 2
20.10.10 GP H v FC Copenhagen 2-0 Messi 2
Other European titles: European Cup 1 (1992), Cup Winners
Cup 4 (1979, 1982, 1989, 1997), Fairs Cup 3 (1958, 1960, 1966)
CL record: 2 titles (2006, 2009), 4 finals, 8 semi-finals,
16.02.11 KO A v Arsenal 1-2 Villa
Jeffren Suarez (Spain) 2/0 4/0 4/0
Jonathan Dos Santos (Mexico) 1/0 2/0 2/0
Victor Vazquez (Spain) 1/1 2/1 2/1
Thiago Alcantara (Spain) 1/0 1/0 1/0
Sergi Roberto (Spain) 1/0 1/0 1/0
Oriol Romeu (Spain) 0/0 0/0 0/0
Ibrahim Afellay (Netherlands) 5/0 5/0 25/0 PSV
7.12.10 GP H v Rubin Kazan 2-0 Fontas, Vazquez Go Here
Nguyen Vo Hoai Tram, believed to be the mastermind behind M88’s operations in Vietnam — where gambling is illegal — is still at large along with several other suspects.
In recent years the government and many lawmakers have been considering legalizing sports betting.
According to the indictment, Tram was the representative of M88, which offers sports betting and other gambling services in many Asian countries.
Through Tram, who was then the director of Hanoi-based media company News Plus, in 2010 his deputy Cu Thi Thanh Hai, Nguyen Le Sang, then deputy director of PR and marketing at Vietnam International Bank, and four others became the website’s agents.
A Ho Chi Minh City court Tuesday sent 52 people to jail and gave seven others suspended sentences for involvement with the Philippines-based M88, one of the world’s biggest online casinos.
Their job was to open personal bank accounts, including in the name of their relatives, to obtain money from gamblers and send to winners.
When their operations were busted in early 2013, their illegal activities were worth VND2 trillion (US$91.63 million), prosecutors said.
Six of the accused, who were the site’s agents in Vietnam, were sentenced to two to seven years in prison for “organizing gambling”.
Meanwhile, luxury casinos have been springing up around the country to cater exclusively to foreign nationals.
The rest were found guilty of “gambling”, with 46 getting terms ranging from one and a half to four years. Go Here
Add a comment…
Yes a few times with the latest during Kickass. Me in the back seat while she rode leaning forwards between the front seats of the car Go Here
“As long as they are not redbacks or funnel webs that’s okay,” said I.
This also happens in places like Brazil, where – as you’re about to see – the phenomenon is also terrifying. Photo: Reuters
…in Australia. UUUGGGHH.”
“We’ve seen heaps of this around the highlands in the last few weeks,” said L. They can fly across the sea with the greatest of ease!
The above image comes from Reddit user “IShouldaStoppedThere” of West Geelong, Australia (the same general region as the rest of these incidents. It’s also not the apocalypse and it’s not a plague of any sort. Balooning
2. “What sort of freaking hellish place on Earth… This can result in the spider flying more than a mile above the surface of the earth.
1. This is not the first time this webbing of entire landscapes has happened.
Spiders have been known to fly 3 Kilometers high using this ballooning technique. They’ve just got to catch the right gust of wind.
This is why spiders live everywhere. Thousands of flying spiders falling from the sky, creating an ethereal, other-worldly event the likes of which you’ve only likely ever seen in a dream. “It was beautiful.”
“Every time I’d walk outside my feet would get covered in very fine cobweb-like substance,” said one anonymous woman from approximately 30 minutes from Yass, just East of Wagga Wagga. “When I looked up at the sun it was like this tunnel of webs going up for a couple of hundred meters into the sky,” said Goulburn resident Ian Watson. Greer of Goulburn
Angel Hair – much of what you’re seeing with this total coverage of the landscape – happens when the surface of the ground becomes waterlogged.
“Our clothes line was covered!” said B. And it’s not the last. After large amounts of rain, spiders that normally live under the ground will come up and make temporary webs above the surface.
“When I heard about it, I was entirely squicked,” said SlashGear’s own Chris Davies.
Further reports suggest webbing of an entire landscape as far away as Holden Hill, SA. Angel Hair
It’s raining spiders in Australia again – SlashGear
Australia’s Southern Tablelands are experiencing an Angel Hair event – a spider migration which covers entire towns in spiderwebs. Get fire. Or a nightmare – depending on your preferences. This photo was taken approximately 1 year ago.
“And the clothes line and clothes were absolutely entangled in it.”
This archive video shows the Anelosimus eximius, which doesn’t necessarily use ballooning to make the horror you see in this video – instead this is more of a Sheet Web which apparently, according to a so-called “local biologist” in Brazil, is something of a “regular occurrence.”
“I saw that yesterday and I refuse to look at it again,” said an anonymous onlooker. That’s about 12 hours away from Goulburn. The whole bottom of Australia, that is.
Two migratory techniques are used by the tiny spiders that’ve taken over Goulburn earlier this month:
While this happens in most places that spiders live, it’s particularly pronounced in Australia as they’ve got one whole heck of a lot of spiders to speak of.
Where everything is terrifying.
No thank you.
Story TimelineSpider silk conducts heat better than other organic materialsThe Amazing Spider-Man: Emma Stone talks up her first big-budget effects filmAndrew Garfield speaks candidly on playing The Amazing Spider-ManAncient fossil showing spider attack is one-of-a-kindSpidernaut Nefertiti dies after space hunting experimentSpiders spiked with graphene weave ultra-strong webs
More information on the Goulburn landscape coverage can be found in a report from Australia by Inga Ting for the Sydney Morning Herald from earlier last week. It’s an entirely natural occurrence and is not at all unheard of. Burn them all.
ABOVE: AAP Image/Lukas Coch, Australia Source: AAP
Ballooning is when a baby spider releases a stream of silk at the top of a structure – a corn stalk or a tree – and lets the wind carry it where it may. Kennedy of Goulburn.
. So if you’d like to keep away from spiderweb environments, according to this map, maybe just stay out of Southern Australia entirely.
Above: Fields are covered in spiderwebs amid rising floodwaters in Wagga Wagga. Carney of Exeter, SH.NSW, Australia.
While the Wagga Wagga photo you see above was captured back in 2012, you can see here how the path of madness fits in with the greater whole Go Here
Plenty of top quality styles and fabrics at resonable prices.
Add a comment…
wicked weasels are by far the most sexiest ive seen around, my gf looks stunning in them.
Comments Go Here
It’s a big day and I’m proud of the state.
Ultimate Poker Chairman Tom Breitling said Monday:
Earlier this year, Nevada’s governor signed a bill into law, authorizing online gambling for Nevada residents. They’d never be able to boast these gigantic nine-figure jackpots if they had to keep all lotteries intrastate. Nevada (as you might expect) was the first jump on the bandwagon.
Although the measures being taken are still hush-hush, Chris Derossi, Ultimate Poker’s CTO gave a clue when he said that all players must have a mobile device that can be traced through mobile networks. Burnett, the chair of the Nevada State Gaming Control Board, said:
Think of it like the Mega Millions and other multi-state lottery programs. The only way such gamblers would opt for online gaming, Matthew Stout, one of the top-ranked poker players worldwide said, would be if the states pooled their resources in a manner similar to multi-state lotteries such as Powerball and Mega Millions. Both New Jersey and Delaware now also have similar laws on their books, but Nevada is the first state to go live with an authorized online gambling site.
It’s possible, anyway, that players in other states won’t have to wait long for online gambling to reach their borders. After the 2011 “Black Friday” that took down PokerStars and other sites, a court of appeals overturned the Federal Wire Act law that banned states from legitimizing online gambling for the use of their own residents. There is, however, one big catch: Gameplay is limited to those who are physically present within the state of Nevada.
Nevada is now the first state to accept legal, regulated interactive wagers. That alone would halt IP spoofing.
High stakes pokers players, however, say that poker games isolated to a single state are too small to attract the big players. Likewise, there won’t be enough money for tournament players to win until the prize pools are large enough.
The United States’ first fully legal online poker site launched on Tuesday. We’re the first, not only in Nevada but in America, to offer real money poker in a regulated environment.
Naturally, this might bring to mind one word: Tor (or any other proxy server software that can spoof your location).. While both the site and Nevada state regulators are staying mum on their procedures, state regulators said that the method used to determine a player’s location will be far more extensive than simple IP-based geo-location.
This is an important day for the gaming industry. He said:
However, don’t get your hopes up. A.G Go Here